Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Salary and Compensation Trends for Forward Thinking Organizations: Part 2

The budget for salary, compensation, and benefits is not unlimited in most organizations. Thus, in addition to traditional increases to base pay, and variable rewards, such as bonuses, profit-sharing and gain-sharing, I recommend attention to quality of work life rewards. These can include the following.

  • Payment of a one-time, lump sum payment for a result or outcome that deserves recognition.
  • Payment of smaller rewards with “thank you” notes for above the call of duty contributions These are not necessarily tied to an achieved result, but they are contributions, that when emphasized, increase the probability of results.
  • Increased emphasis on additional benefits such as pre-paid legal assistance, educational assistance, and vision insurance.
  • Increased opportunity for flexible work arrangements and job-sharing.
  • An organizational emphasis on the training and development of employees.
  • Clear career paths so employees see opportunities within your organization.

In this last category, quality of work life rewards, your imagination is your only limitation. The key is to ensure fairness and consistency for similarly performing and contributing people, whenever possible. I encourage you to do even more for those employees who measurably contribute more to your organization’s success. (Of course, this opens up a second philosophical debate – fodder for a later article – about how and whether your organization provides an equal opportunity for all employees to excel.)

In summary, organizations are moving toward salary and compensation systems that emphasize flexibility, goal achievement, and variable pay based on performance, and less emphasis on increases to base pay. They are using bonuses based on profit and accomplishment to add to employee compensation. The rising cost of benefits is causing rethinking of their place in the compensation system. Forward thinking organizations are emphasizing “quality of work life” rewards and recognition to add to the value of the total compensation package.

-----------------------------------------------------

Researching Salary and Worker Compensation Online

Online salary information is often unreliable. It frequently averages too many variables into one range. The salary ranges cover too many industries, nationally or internationally, and lump all the data into one range. (See my related how-to article about how to calculate an employee's salary, for more information.)

This noted, you may find the following websites useful.

You will also find salary information at professional associations such as the Society for Human Resource Management and others, but usually available only to members.

Salary and Compensation Trends for Forward Thinking Organizations: Part 1

How to research salary, salary calculators, salary surveys, salary comparisons, basically, all things salary, online, is one of the most frequent requests for information received by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). This makes sense when you consider the importance of salary to attract talented people, retain key employees, and maintain an excited, motivated workforce.

Given the shifts occurring in attitudes and practices about salary and compensation, this is not surprising. Organizations are struggling to keep up with changes in salary and compensation thinking.

Gone are the days when organizations gave equivalent increases to all organization members. These salary increases, in the one percent to five percent range, sent the wrong message to under performers. They left organizations with too small of a budget to adequately reward their top performers. While many companies still use this as their salary criteria, forward thinking organizations are thinking about salary and compensation in a very different way.

According to an article on the SHRM website (you must be a member to access), to get the attention of your better performing staff members, you must offer a variable pay rate of seven to eight percent, in addition to their base pay. A system that rewards better performers cannot reward all staff members alike. In addition to sending the wrong message, your pool of money is not unlimited. You must use your compensation as one of your most important communication tools, to send a message about your organization’s expectations and goal achievement rewards.

Current Compensation Thinking

My current thinking about salary and compensation includes the following components.

  • Organizations need to develop a compensation philosophy and direction in writing that is reviewed by the Board of Directors and agreed to by your managers.
  • Particularly in an entrepreneurial, market-driven company, the compensation philosophy needs to include a method for grouping similar jobs for purposes of broad banding, since promotional opportunities are limited.
  • It should include a responsible, measurement system for awarding variable pay. I recommend less emphasis on increasing base pay, and more emphasis on distributing gains via bonuses that reward actual goal attainment.
  • Goal attainment should be rewarded for both individual and organizational goal achievement to foster teamwork and eliminate the “lone ranger” mentality.
  • Real goal achievement is attached to outcomes or deliverables that are measurable or offer a shared picture of what success looks like. They should not reward checking items off a “to-do” list.
  • As the cost of benefits has increased, their place in a total compensation package has increased in importance. Shifting the costs of some benefits to employees is a last-option scenario.

Salary and Compensation Trends for Forward Thinking Organizations

How to research salary, salary calculators, salary surveys, salary comparisons, basically, all things salary, online, is one of the most frequent requests for information received by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). This makes sense when you consider the importance of salary to attract talented people, retain key employees, and maintain an excited, motivated workforce.

Given the shifts occurring in attitudes and practices about salary and compensation, this is not surprising. Organizations are struggling to keep up with changes in salary and compensation thinking.

Gone are the days when organizations gave equivalent increases to all organization members. These salary increases, in the one percent to five percent range, sent the wrong message to underperformers. They left organizations with too small of a budget to adequately reward their top performers. While many companies still use this as their salary criteria, forward thinking organizations are thinking about salary and compensation in a very different way.

According to an article on the SHRM website (you must be a member to access), to get the attention of your better performing staff members, you must offer a variable pay rate of seven to eight percent, in addition to their base pay. A system that rewards better performers cannot reward all staff members alike. In addition to sending the wrong message, your pool of money is not unlimited. You must use your compensation as one of your most important communication tools, to send a message about your organization’s expectations and goal achievement rewards.

Current Compensation Thinking

My current thinking about salary and compensation includes the following components.

  • Organizations need to develop a compensation philosophy and direction in writing that is reviewed by the Board of Directors and agreed to by your managers.
  • Particularly in an entrepreneurial, market-driven company, the compensation philosophy needs to include a method for grouping similar jobs for purposes of broad banding, since promotional opportunities are limited.
  • It should include a responsible, measurement system for awarding variable pay. I recommend less emphasis on increasing base pay, and more emphasis on distributing gains via bonuses that reward actual goal attainment.
  • Goal attainment should be rewarded for both individual and organizational goal achievement to foster teamwork and eliminate the “lone ranger” mentality.
  • Real goal achievement is attached to outcomes or deliverables that are measurable or offer a shared picture of what success looks like. They should not reward checking items off a “to-do” list.
  • As the cost of benefits has increased, their place in a total compensation package has increased in importance. Shifting the costs of some benefits to employees is a last-option scenario.

Friday, February 6, 2009

Simply Hired Salary Calculator

With Simply Hired's new salary calculator, you can see how your current income stacks up against the salaries of those in the same profession, both locally and nationally. And if you find that your wages could use a boost, head on over to our job search and find a job that will really pay the bills



Tuesday, February 3, 2009

2007 Survey and Analysis of Teacher Salary Trends

The average salary for traditional public school teachers increased 4.5 percent in 2006-07 to $51,009, according to the AFT's latest teacher salary survey, marking the first time average teacher pay exceeded $50,000 and the first time since 2003 that teacher salaries surpassed the annual rate of inflation. The AFT report also includes never-before-released salary data for charter school teachers in 29 states-of the 40 that have charter schools-where the news was not as positive. The average charter school teacher salary was $41,106-nearly $10,000 less than that for

Monday, February 2, 2009

Negotiating salary in a bad economy… should you do it?

Wait. What?

Salary?

Do you know what that means?!?!?

I GOT A JOB!

My conference call with ‘Company X’ went very well. After HR management explained the benefits, I was told to prepare myself for a lower than expected salary.

Then she read the number…which was significantly more than I had hoped.

Naturally, I acted completely un-phased while silently doing a one armed handstand. Thank heavens it was a teleconference. I may not have seemed so composed in person.

They offered me just short of the position max salary for the 2009 fiscal year. I didn’t negotiate for more.

Here’s the dilemma. I’ve been in salary negotiations before and I’ve never once accepted a first offer, but this time, I didn’t think twice about taking it. According to some, this was a mistake.

But here’s my reasoning… in these economic times, I don’t want to be seen as the person who asks for more knowing full well there are others who would take less.

I think it would be foolhardy to demand an equal salary to what I was making in good economic times.

But don’t give up on me. I know my value.

I know they will see my value.

If they don’t… I’ll remind them.